Changes

EM.Picasso

12 bytes added, 13:11, 11 August 2015
/* Advantages & Limitations of Planar MoM Simulation */
[[Image:Info_icon.png|40px]] Click here to learn more about the '''[[Planar Method of Moments | Theory of Planar Method of Moments]]'''.
=== Advantages & Limitations of EM.Picasso's Planar MoM Simulation Simulator ===
EM.Picasso assumes that your planar structure has a substrate (background structure) of infinite lateral extents. In addition, the planar 2.5-D assumption restricts the 3D objects of your physical structure to embedded prismatic objects that can only support vertical currents. These assumptions limit the variety and scope of the applications of EM.Picasso. For example, you cannot use EM.Picasso to analyze a patch antenna with a finite-sized dielectric substrate. If the substrate edge effects are of concern in your modeling problem, you must use [[EM.Tempo]] instead. On the other hand, since EM.Picasso's Planar MoM simulation engine incorporates the Green's functions of the background structure into the analysis, only the finite-sized traces like microstrips and slots are discretized by the mesh generator. As a result, the size of EM.Picasso's computational problem is normally much smaller than that of [[EM.Tempo]]. In addition, EM.Picasso generates a hybrid rectangular-triangular mesh of your planar structure with a large number of equal-sized rectangular cells. Taking full advantage of all the symmetry and invariance properties of dyadic Green's functions often results in very fast computation times that easily make up for EM.Picasso's limited applications. A particularly efficient application of EM.Picasso is the modeling of periodic multilayer structures at oblique incidence angles.
28,333
edits